08 March 2009
more reasons why serious bloggers should refrain from linking to wikipedia entries
Wikipedia scrubs Obama eligibility
excerpt:
Mention of citizenship issues deleted in minutes, 'offending' users banned
Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" mega-site written and edited entirely by its users, has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency, with administrators kicking off anyone who writes about the subject, WND has learned.
A perusal through Obama's current Wikipedia entry finds a heavily guarded, mostly glowing biography about the U.S. president. Some of Obama's most controversial past affiliations, including with Rev. Jeremiah Wright and former Weathermen terrorist Bill Ayers, are not once mentioned, even though those associations received much news media attention and served as dominant themes during the presidential elections last year.
Also completely lacking is any mention of the well-publicized concerns surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as commander-in-chief.
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 300,000 others and sign up now!
Indeed, multiple times, Wikipedia users who wrote about the eligibility issues had their entries deleted almost immediately and were banned from re-posting any material on the website for three days. ~ read more
====
see also
judicial inc's
wikipedia caveat
====
related postswhen is a word a word? u.s. department of justice caught editing wikipedia for zionist benefit more bad news for wikipedia: 'littered with inaccuracies' laura tennessen barack obama campaign starts a larry sinclair 'debunking' wikipedia entry wikipedia deletes obama campaign's larry sinclair 'attack page'
====
EXTERNAL LINK
see also
judicial inc's
wikipedia caveat
====
related posts
====
Subscribe to: