the trial court wrote in its written reasons for judgment that "The testimony clearly establishes that the Vance Avenue facility had problems." then somehow, inexplicably reasons that "[h]owever, the fact that a ceiling tile is stained or discolored does not necessarily constitute a defect that would impose liability upon defendant."
the likely reason for this ruling on both the trial court and third circuit's part is to protect the rapides parish school board from a flood of lawsuits stemming from mold problems and the resulting bad publicity.
====
related posts
related posts
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.