Trump’s tariffs trigger price hikes at large online retailers
-
Americans will soon pay more for cheap online items amid tariff chaos.
57 minutes ago
08 April 2010
pineville city court judge phillip terrell issues fraudulent judgement on behalf of his close personal friend/alleged former law partner greg aymond
as many are aware, unethical alexandria, la.shyster, greg aymond a/k/a gregory r. aymond, louisiana bar roll number 17,449 has filed a scam "defamation" lawsuit against a person that he claims, without offering a shred of evidence, posts to wst...
but all mr. aymond's "lawsuit" has done, is to expose even more members of the criminal network and given us important clues on how they operate.
to wit:
on the morning of monday, 28 december 2009, the "defendant" was served "legal papers" by a uniformed pineville, la. city marshal driving a big 'ol pineville, city marshal van.
this service was supposedly pursuant to louisiana code of civil procedure article 1234.
====
Greg Aymond Phillip Terrell Phony Legal Papers click here to download eleven page .pdf [5.75 .mb]
====
after the marshal departed, the "defendant" noticed that the court order was null and void because it was unsigned -- page ten.so, the very next day, (tuesday, 29 december 2009), he personally appeared at the pineville city court clerk of court office with the above "notice of hearing" in hand.
the clerk of court that was on duty that day he spoke to is named lindsay delrie.
he showed the "notice of hearing" to ms. delrie who confirmed that it was not signed.
additionally, ms. delrie pulled the case file containing the original papers that mr. aymond's attorney, susan ford fiser, louisiana bar roll number 22,366, ford law firm, 1630 metro drive, alexandria, la. tel. #318.442.8899, filed and the order there was unsigned as well.
ms. delrie searched all through the court house but no signed order could be found. page eleven.
next, the "defendant" showed ms. delrie the "citation and petition" that he was served on 12 november 2009 and asked her to point out to him the judge's signature ordering the "defendant" to answer the questions.
ms. delrie couldnt locate a signed order there either.
====
Aymond Citation Petition Original Complete Served November 2009
click here to download nine page .pdf [5.32 mb]
click here to download nine page .pdf [5.32 mb]
this could be important because weeks before the "defendant" was ever served mr. aymond posted some court papers which purport to contain an attached signed court order -- but that order didnt specifically order the "defendant" to do anything. besides, the "defendant" was never served with that order or even a certified copy of it or any other order whatsoever.
and just who is this mysterious katherine geary? what role is she playing in all this? as of this date and time the "defendant" has never been served with a motion and order withdrawing her as the "defendant's" curator.
why was ms. geary appointed as the "defendant's" curator in the first place?
mr. aymond has had the "defendant's" name, address and telephone number on file since june of 2007!
on or about 20 june 2007 mr. aymond telephoned the "defendant" and solicited his name to add to a list of "concerned citizens" in a letter he was sending to the rapides parish district attorney and the state attorney general requesting an investigation into the city of alexandria, la. council "apparent violation of the state's open meeting law."
the "defendant" copied and pasted the form of the request and emailed that with his name, address and telephone number to mr. aymond. wst... posted about it here.
back in 2007 the "defendant" was surprised that mr. aymond never sent him the complete copy of the letter he sent and it wasnt until november 2009 when he filed the below public records request to the rapides parish district attorney that he learned why mr. aymond never sent him a copy.
mr. aymond lied to the "defendant" -- he never used his name in the letter: apparently, is was a ruse to get his name and address.
RPDA Public Records Request November 2009
click here to download five page .pdf [2.19 mb]
just because mr. aymond didnt include the "defendant's" name in the above letter still doesnt change the fact that mr. aymond had the "defendant's" name and address all along -- so why was a phony "curator" appointed? and why hasnt she withdrew?
by the way, the proper spelling of ms. marks' first name is tami and not tammy.
so the "defendant" left the pineville city court clerk's office that december day satisfied that he had fulfilled his obligation to notify the clerk about the null and void order.
next, the "defendant" went out of his way to make himself available for service of process for a signed, legal court order.
but the days stretched into weeks then over a month passed and no order was ever served.
click picture to enlarge
so on thursday 18 february 2010 the "defendant" noticed on the caller id a call from the pineville clerk of court office. he missed the call because he was out.
assuming that the pineville clerk of court was an honest, respectable person and was calling, for instance, to say that since the order was unsigned and couldnt be fixed or cured in time, the "hearing" scheduled for the next day was canceled or postponed or as they say in the biz continued, he immediately returned her call.
click here to download seventeen page .pdf [134 kb] or here from the louisiana supreme court website
so if judge terrell did sign that order after the "defendant" had been served with a certified true copy -- which was unsigned -- then according to the supremes he could be guilty of a violation of La. R.S. 14:132 and possibly R.S. 14:123.
an interesting observation in the in re dixon disciplinary proceeding: three justices dissented and said that mr. dixon deserved even more punishment. one of the dissenters, the one who wrote the dissent to which the other two joined, is catherine "kitty" kimball who is now the chief justice.
the very next day, friday, 19 february 2010, the "defendant" received by certified mail number 7009 1680 0000 2340 4370:
Pineville Clerk Letter 18 February 2010
click here to download three page .pdf [122 kb]
this "notice of hearing" IS NOT a court order nor could it be confused as one. notice that the pineville clerk sent a copy to mr. aymond's attorney, ms. fiser, who must have known, or should have known that this WAS NOT a court order.
noting that ms. fiser specifically requested that her motion and order be served on the "defendant" pursuant to louisiana code of civil procedure article 1234 he once again went out of his way to make himself available to receive same.
but no court order or any order or court papers were ever served on the "defendant" whatsoever until around 3:37 pm cdt wednesday 31 march 2010 when the "defendant" checked the mailbox and found the below "notice of signing" and "judgment."
Notice of Signing
click here to download three page .pdf [1.53 mb]
curiously, the pineville clerk sent this by regular mail rather than by certified mail.
the very next morning, thursday, 01 april 2010 the "defendant" phoned the pineville city clerk of court teddy barbe for some sort of explanation.
incredulously, as you can hear for yourself, before the slams the phone down in the "defendant's" ear, mr. barbe maintains that you dont have to have a court order all you have to do is just know about a hearing.
after all we are talking about several potential felony violations of the law here.
like R.S. 14:133 filing and maintaining false public records (because the 26 march 2010 court hearing entire transcript as well as the "notice of signing" and "judgment" must be false public records and dont forget the 18 february 2010 "notice of hearing" letter they tried to pass off as a court order) and the aforementioned laws in the dixon case, there are also issues of 18 usc 1341 (mail fraud) and 18 usc 1346 scheme or artifice to defraud
then actually investigated it and called the "defendant" back and if he was in the right said something like "well, according to the code of civil procedure article blah, blah, blah and this and that court case, you dont need an order all you need is just know about it?"
or if the "defendant" was correct said something like "look i'am sorry let me talk to the judge and see about getting this turned around?" .
instead of slamming the phone down in a constituent's ear?
mr. barbe by his attitude and demeanor might be properly described as a freak. listening to that audio, he reminded us of that fictional character created by tulsa, oklahoma radio station kmod disc jockeys brent douglas and phil stone called "roy d. mercer."
we half expected him at any second to bust out with "how big of an 'ol boy are ya?"
is mr. barbe even qualified to be a clerk of court?
did you know that under La. R.S. 13:1884 a city court judge can appoint his own clerk of court? this is about as one (of many) of the dumbest laws there are.
all this does is allow these judges to appoint members of their crime gangs to that position in order to cover-up all the bogus orders and judgments they are or are not signing and/or serving.
====
mr. aymond in what he represents to be a blog post dated 20 february 2010 seemingly acknowledged the necessity of opposing party being served with a court order. although from the way its written, apparently, his attorney susan ford fiser lied to him in the part where he claims that it was her that discovered the failure of the clerk of court to serve the order.
alexandria, la. attorney susan ford fiser louisiana bar roll 22,366needs to pay a little bit better attention to her legal papers
as we've already written surely ms. fiser could have known, must have known, should have known that the 18 february 2010 letter from the pineville clerk of court's office was not a court order.
additionally, ms. fiser could have known, must have known, should have known that nowhere in her case file was any evidence whatsoever that the "defendant" had ever been served with a court order.
still ms. fiser traveled over to the pineville city court house that friday 26 march 2010 and apparently allowed an illegal court proceeding to take place.
it appears that ms. fiser allowed for the creation of a false public record as well -- in the creation of the illegal court hearing transcript. the entire hearing transcript is also a false public record. La. R.S. 14:133.
the louisiana code of civil procedure article 371 states in part:
[an attorney] shall not knowingly encourage or produce false evidence; and shall not knowingly make any misrepresentation, or otherwise impose upon or deceive the court.ms. fiser could have known or must have known or should have known that when she returned to her office and typed up her ill gotten "judgment" that she was creating a false public record and when she presumably deposited it into the mail to the pineville clerk of court office that act could possibly be interpreted as a violation of 18 usc 1341 and maybe 18 usc 1346.
so is all this evidence that ms. fiser has knowledge of and is helping work the scam -- or is it evidence that ms. fiser is an incompetent attorney?
mr. aymond's friend, judge phillip terrell, of all people, could have known or must have known or should have known that he had never signed a court order as well. didnt he bother to look at the case file before him?
judge terrell, could have known or must have known or should have known that there was no evidence whatsoever that the "defendant" had been served with any court order.
pineville city court judge phillip terrell on 01 february 2010playing defense attorney for
winnfield, la. taser thug scott nugent
-- cnn video
====
http://www.centrallapolitics.blogspot.com/2007/07/interview-with-hon-j-phillip-terrell-jr.htmlon 16 july 2007 judge terrell apparently lent the prestige of his judicial office to advance the private interest another. namely, his pal greg aymond. is this possibly a violation of canon 2 b of the code of judicial conduct?
notice how mr. aymond didnt disclose that he and the judge were working at least one case together at the time of the interview either.
notice how mr. aymond didnt disclose that he and the judge were working at least one case together at the time of the interview either.
