09 July 2010
by paul drockton
mr. drocton writes some interesting posts sometimes; we've noticed that his biggest problem is that he likes to refer to the mysterious"illuminati" and "new world order" nonsense; preferring to use those generic terms in place of jew(s).
The Old Liberal Adage, "You Can't Legislate Morality" may be true, but it never stopped an Illuminati controlled judge from destroying sound moral legislation. Take for instance, last night's ruling by a Federal judge in Boston, Massachusetts:
"Judge Joseph L. Tauro ruled that the federal Defense of Marriage law violates the Constitutional right of married same-sex couples to equal protection under the law and upends the federal government’s long history of allowing states to set their own marriage laws.
"This court has determined that it is clearly within the authority of the Commonwealth to recognize same-sex marriages among its residents, and to afford those individuals in same-sex marriages any benefits, rights, and privileges to which they are entitled by virtue of their marital status," Tauro wrote. "The federal government, by enacting and enforcing DOMA, plainly encroaches upon the firmly entrenched province of the state." (Source)
What most people don't know, is that sanctimonious moralist Mitt Romney is the reason why same-sex marriages are permitted in Massachusetts in the first place. Something that he and his campaign will never admit to his conservative political following. Yet, the truth always comes out in the end (often on this website), for men like Romney. Consider the following:
* "In 1994 Campaign vs. Ted Kennedy for U.S. Senate: Romney pledged he “will provide more effective leadership” than Kennedy on homosexual rights; endorsed by Log Cabin Republicans.
* 2000-2002: As head of Salt Lake City Olympic Committee, Romney banned Boy Scouts from participating.
* 2001 Called first citizens' petition to define marriage “too extreme” and “bigoted” because it banned civil unions.
* 2002 Campaign for Governor: Romney makes promises to GLBT community, according to leading Boston homosexual newspaper; endorsed by homosexual activist Log Cabin Republicans." (Source)
In 2003, while Romney was governor, the State Supreme Court ruled that "same-sex" marriage is protected by the Mass. Constitution. Romney responded by talking out of both sides of his mouth. In one breathe, stating that he would support a Constitutional Amendment supporting traditional marriage. In the next, he said that "we must provide basic civil rights and appropriate benefits to nontraditional couples" (Wink, wink, Nod, nod).
The key here is to understand Romney semantics. He would not support gay marriage in a Church, but he would support homosexual marriages performed by a Justice of the Peace. This is evidenced by the fact that he did not support an effort to remove the four Justices that issued the gay marriage ruling.
Governor Romney also had the opportunity to over-rule the State Supreme Court through an "Executive Order". This would have sent the issue to a higher Court and eventually would have been supported by the U.S. Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court has consistently ruled in favor of traditional marriage, so, Romney would have won the battle. Either way, it would have been tied up in the courts and Romney could have used this fact to continue the ban.
He could have also forced the issue by simply refusing to enforce the ruling, thus driving the debate into the higher courts as well. At the time, Romney had multiple venues to frustrate the Massachusetts Court ruling. That's not to say that he did nothing. No, the words come easily to Romney. even if they are never backed by any meaningful action.
"Feb. 5, 2004: Romney publishes editorial in Wall Street Journal laying all blame on the SJC for problem in Massachusetts. Suggests other states strengthen marriage statutes and pass constitutional amendments. Says don’t “attack … gays, singles or non-traditional couples.”...
March 26, 2004: Word leaks out that Romney’s Dept. of Public Health (DPH) and attorneys are planning training sessions for Town Clerks and preparing same-sex marriage licenses.
March 29, 2004: Romney tells Republicans in Mass. legislature to vote for Travaglini-Lees “compromise amendment” which would ban same-sex marriage but establish civil unions (and would not go to voters before Nov. 2006). Republican legislators had earlier opposed this amendment because of the civil unions clause, and it passed only due to their changed votes."
You can read about the rest of the Romney perfidy here.
So now we have a Federal Judge building on Mitt Romney's success. The key to understanding evil is to realize that they know they need society to do a 180 degree turn if their policies are to be adopted. They never go for the whole enchilada. They take a nibble, then deny it. Then they take a few more nibbles while you argue with them on whether its still a nibble or a bite. Finally you get one of the nibbles they took, back from them, but, to your surprise, a piece is missing from the other end.
Eventually, all you have left is a picture of the enchilada signed by numerous celebrities, along with a promise from the Federal government to "bring back the whole enchilada". But, the enchilada is long gone, and they have no intention of helping you recoup their losses.
You see, there is the left hand of the Illuminati (Liberals/Democrats), and a right hand (Republicans/Neo-cons). In a "Punch and Judy" show, the hand puppets appear to beat the heck out of each other. While you keep an eye on one hand, the other one is stealing your money, home, job and religious values.
The culmination of "Left Path" ideology is Communism. The culmination of "Right Path" philosophy is Fascism. In reality, they both enslave the general population and transfer wealth from the many to the few.
For those of you carefully watching for the next puppet to take the stage, I offer this word of advice, "Hide your enchiladas". ~ view original
Posted by wst... at 18:57