08 August 2006

dump lieberman


granted, we dont get many visitors from connecticut so this post is mostly for posterity. tonight let us hope and pray that this prowar george w bush ass kisser joe lieberman loses and loses big and let us further hope and pray that it starts a national trend.
added 8:17pm cdt from drudge:
Lamont Leads In Early Results
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
189 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 25.27%
Lamont, Ned 40,934 55.09%
Lieberman, Joe (i) 33,375 44.91%
====
added 8:20pm cdt
Lamont Leads In Early Results
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
253 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 33.82%
Lamont, Ned 55,294 54.09%
Lieberman, Joe (i) 46,941 45.91
====
====
added 8:27pm cdt
Lamont Leads In Early Results
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
287 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 38.37%
Lamont, Ned 61,446 53.62%
Lieberman, Joe (i) 53,159 46.38%
====
added 8:39pm cdt
Lamont Leads In Early Results
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%BR> Lamont, Ned 70,444 52.13%
Lieberman, Joe (i) 64,700 47.87%
====
added 9:02 pm cdt
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
575 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 76.87%
Lamont, Ned 109,239 51.76%
Lieberman, Joe (i) 101,818 48.24%
====
====
added 9:15 pm cdt
Connecticut // U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
608 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 81.28%
Lamont, Ned 116,387 51.71% **Winner
Lieberman, Joe (i) 108,683 48.29%
====
added 10:39 pm cdt
loserman er lieberman loses his hometown of new haven, connecticut - 52% to 48%
source: hartford courant
see: Lieberman Concedes Defeat In Senate Race
11:22 PM EDT, August 8, 2006

at

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous09 August, 2006 11:53

    What the hell is it with all of the JOE JOE JOE JOE... he lost. This is very strange.

    Usually the media throws the loser under the bus and forgets about him. Joe lost... why are we still talking about him? What is the fixation with this idiot?

    ReplyDelete
  2. wst...09 August, 2006 12:34

    lol that pretty much says it all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AWG09 August, 2006 12:53

    Neocon fever, methinks. It curdles the brain.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous09 August, 2006 13:17

    AWG is correct and it boggles the mind! So what if Lieberman voted for the war in Iraq? He's a damn liberal! Yet Rush Limbaugh and the usual suspects are treating him like a god! What the hell??

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous09 August, 2006 13:47

    And what's with this crap? Leiberman lost becaus HE STINKS! That's the only reason people lose races.

    ReplyDelete
  6. wst...09 August, 2006 13:53

    thanks for that link reco - noot da hoot is trying to spin it so that everyone that doesnt support bush is an insurgent. lmao.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous09 August, 2006 13:58

    Give us real leadership! The crazy right and the crazy left are our only options???

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous09 August, 2006 14:01

    Oh, and one other thing. What's up with the War in Iraq being front and center in '08? I'm predicting that the Bushites are going to "spin" their way out of Iraq, and the troops will be gone before next presidential bid.

    My prediction is that while Iraq will gradually fade, gas prices are going to get worse.

    ReplyDelete
  9. wst...09 August, 2006 14:13

    we sure hope that you are right with respect to bringing our troops home the quicker the better. absolutely on the gas prices - look for spot shortages like it was immediately after rita.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous09 August, 2006 14:20

    I think that the neocons are dead men walking and they don't know it. The recent story about those 11 egyptians is proof that they have no intention on stopping terrorism. Why in the hell are they letting Middle Easterners come into this country on student visas?

    THAT'S how we stop terrorism. Every American knows that but Dubya won't do it! Don't preach to me about stopping terrorism when you're letting Abdul Mohammond Makmujammi come into this country legally!

    ReplyDelete
  11. wst...09 August, 2006 14:55

    yeah the proper thing to do and to have done would be to freeze all immigration for awhile until we can decide who is here do us harm. and how to sort them out.

    ReplyDelete
  12. wst...10 August, 2006 00:00

    well the only logical conclusion that one can draw is that the government doesnt want to stop illegal immigration, that the government is allowing the borders to remain porus on purpose and for some nefarious reason. this isnt directed at you personally nick but people just will not deal with this fact and accept it. people see it yet they go to great lengths to not deal with it. they make excuses like "that cant be what it is it must be something else, etc" but the evidence is staring everyone right there in the face. its not only this way with immigration but a lot of other things too.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous10 August, 2006 00:01

    Nick:

    Your reasoning for getting rid of foreigners was a little too apologetic for my taste.

    The bottom line is that

    A. We were attacked by arabs on student visas

    B. We don't much like arabs on student visas anymore.

    I'm sick of all this touchy feely crap about tolerance of people who want to kill us.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.