via youtube.com: in the wake of john kerrys "joke" and the subsequent white house spin, tell us, which is more egregious; kerry or bush?
credit to: musicforamerica.org
[W]here was the outcry when George W. Bush chuckled and guffawed at the fact that his administration concocted the most lurid propaganda since Joseph Goebbels and used it to deceive the American people into acquiescing to a never-ending war that has destroyed a nation and left hundreds of thousands dead and destitute?
Where was Bush's apology after he ridiculed the supposed purpose, mission and raison d'etre of nearly 3,000 mother's sons who marched to war on a tissue of lies and came back in flag-draped coffins?
At the 60th annual dinner of the Radio and Television Correspondents' Association in March 2004, Bush narrated a slideshow of images that showed him puzzled looking around the Oval Office, under tables and behind doors.
"Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere," he mused.
"No, no weapons over there."
"Maybe under here?," Bush chuckled as fat vacuous Republican stooges in the audience smacked their lips amidst fits of laughter and applause for their gracious leader.
Two and a half years later and Bush has failed to apologize for his WMD joke, failed to admit the error of his ways in giving a one finger salute to the crying wives, mothers and daughters who never saw their heroes return home.
Recall also what elitist luminary and still reputed Bush advisor Henry Kissinger said about the troops.
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."
