around 6:30 pm cdt on monday, 26 march 2012, we received another phone call from congressman rodney alexander.
fortunately, his office has -- at least this time, modified their caller id, call display information so that when "congressman rod" with an area code 318 number popped up on our caller id display, we pretty much knew that the call was either another one of his "live telephone town hall meetings" (we prefer the phrase telephonic town hall) or a political robo call, either one potentially blog-worthy. so we switched on our recording device.
"i even read an article today, not sure where it came from, i need to go back and check and see, that indicated that perhaps there is a very wealthy individual in the nation that is buying some of the firearms companies with the sole purpose of cutting back and restricting sales to individuals.while we continue to oppose any and all forms of gun control or bullet control and believe that the citizenry should and must have access to the same firepower that the military and police has (or else what's the point of being armed?) our view of the second amendment and the right wing gun nuts is evolving.
just limit the sales of the firearms companies to the government, police force or the military, so forth.
i dont know whether there is any validity to that or not -- but we do know that there are people out there including the administration that would like to see fewer firearms available to law-abiding citizens and i think it's clear that our forefathers and the founding document -- the constitution, clearly indicated that they felt like one should always continue to have the right to bear arms.
so, i'm there. i've got my lifetime nra card in my wallet right now and wont do anything, will not vote for any measure that dilutes the strength of the second amendment."
Conservatives are not "tough on crime"one instance in which we disagree with mr. hufschmid's analysis is that the reason american's do nothing about crime and especially corruption, is because they are psychologically disarmed.
The conservatives boast that they are honest people who are "tough on crime", but they are only tough on crimes that other people commit, especially people of other nations or races.
They are extremely lenient on the crimes that conservatives commit, such as financial fraud, pedophilia, price-fixing, and cheating on taxes.
Barney Frank was elected to Congress by liberals, so we cannot blame conservatives for that. However, an orphan boy testified in court that Frank was just one of many men in leadership positions who were raping orphan boys, but as far as I know, not one conservative proposed that the conservatives take their guns to Congress and arrest Barney Frank and all of the other pedophiles.
Why are the conservatives so tough on black people who smoke marijuana or use cocaine, but they don't do anything about the pedophiles in the government or the Catholic Church?
Incidentally, the issue of Barney Frank and pedophilia should be used as more evidence of how worthless it is to let citizens own guns.
There are millions of conservatives in America with guns, but when are they going to use them?
Crime is rampant in this nation, and corruption is everywhere in government, schools, businesses, and churches.
Larry Silverstein is still walking around freely in New York City.
When are the conservatives going to get together and use their guns to eliminate crime?
The answer is, never.
The conservatives are not interested in standing up to criminals, eliminating government corruption, or analyzing world events.
They want guns for defensive purposes only.
They are like a frightened animal that is hiding in the bushes.
They do not even have the courage to face Barney Frank.
Kay Griggs claimed that Henry Kissinger raped some American soldiers, but what do the conservatives do about that accusation? Nothing!
congressman rodney alexander, apparently stealing a page from the david vitter playbook.
tonight we received what we thought at first glance at the caller id was going to be a robo or sales call to learn that it was an invitation to listen and participate in congressman rodney alexander's live telephonic town hall meeting.
we didnt bother to try and ask a question or participate in any of the polls and as with david vitter, we do not support this treasonous, traitorous rat.
however, we do find these events to be pretty ingenious and think that more politicians at all levels local, state and federal should put them on.
we dont support subversive, treasonous, traitorous senator david vitter at all -- however, having said that we have to give him credit for being pretty darn clever in getting his propaganda out.
this evening at 4:11 p.m., cst, we received a telephone call and on the caller id it read "tele town hall 253-236-2011." we thought that it was some sort of robo-call similar to what we've posted before. so we switched on the recorder and got jumped in to some sort of live telephonic town hall meeting.
unfortunately, around 30 minutes in, the call for whatever reason disconnected.
that's too bad because our question to the senator had to do with the federal reserve. if we had the opportunity to have asked, it would have went something like this:hello senator vitter -- as you know the federal reserve was created by the unconstitutional federal reserve act of 1913 and furthermore the federal reserve is not a federal agency -- in fact it is a privately owned central bank which creates federal reserve notes out of nothing, backed by nothing and at interest.
this was all proven as far back as the 1950's due to the painstaking research by eustace mullins in his book 'the secrets of the federal reserve.'
so my question is -- would you lead the way and/or support an effort to repeal the federal reserve act of 1913 - if so why and if not why?
click here to download 227 page .pdf [1.45 mb]
