08 August 2006

rodney alexander fluff piece

video blog permalink
channel 5 has posted a very heavily edited "video blog" (we thought video blogs were supposed to be unedited start to finish) fluff piece for representative rodney alexander. there was no hard hitting questions. no questions on how rodney alexander could justify his traitorious vote for the usa patriot act. no questions on how rodney alexander could defend his support for the illegal and immoral iraq war. heres a tip for al quartermont: a question is a sentence. a question is not a paragraph of leading statements designed to get the answer you or the candidate want. so, in the future dont try and pass of what should have been billed as "a conversation with rodney alexander" as a video blog.
more later...

related posts:
  • 1st documented sissyman sen craig romero
  • house patriot act vote
  • ater v alexander?
  • dump rodney alexander
  • rodney alexander + knoe-tv & will moses = full of crap
  • la delegation favors extending iraqnam